Monday, February 15, 2010

Apple Patent - Apple, Microsoft sued for patent infringement

Emblaze sues Apple and Microsoft for patent infringement, news brought by news.cnet.com, please read the article and leave your comment below.

Apple, Microsoft sued for patent infringement
by Jim Dalrymple

Apple and Microsoft are being sued for patent infringement, according to a report on AppleInsider on Thursday.

The patent in question, entitled "Apparatus, method and a computer readable medium for generating media packets," was awarded to Emblaze, who filed for the patent in 2002.

The patent describes "a method for generating media packets, the method comprising the steps of: providing at a storage unit packet boundary information representative of locations of potential packet boundaries within media objects; said packet boundary information facilitating generation of packets of varying sizes; wherein said packet boundary information comprises intra access unit offsets; selecting at a packet generator packet boundaries in response to a packet size selection information; and generating media packets in response to the selected packet boundaries."

In other words: a streaming server. Emblaze said in a statement published on Thursday that Apple's HTTP Live Streaming Application (PDF), used in the iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, and Mac OS X infringe on its patent. In addition to sending notification of the lawsuit to Apple, Emblaze also included a license agreement in case the company wanted to settle the dispute quickly.

"Emblaze has made substantial investment into research and development to build a rich portfolio of intellectual property over many years. While we are happy to license our technology to third parties, we will vigorously defend our rights and our competitive position," Naftali Shani, chairman of Emblaze, said in a statement.

Emblaze also says that Microsoft's IIS Smooth Streaming infringes the same patent. The lawsuit gives Microsoft until March 15 to reply.

Category: Apple Patent, Patent Infringement

1 comment:

IP1lwyr said...

Interesting that such a broad patent claim exists and that, evidently, no one thought to license it ahead of time. But perhaps there are other reasons this patent was not licensed, which will come out later in the lawsuit. I hope someone will publish the Answer once it has been filed in this lawsuit.